Quantcast
The Magazine for Youth Ministry
You Are Here
  HOME  REVIEWS  MOVIES
MOVIE REVIEWS SEARCH
X
 MOVIE REVIEWS ARCHIVE

Page   1  2  3  4  5  >

Page   1  2  3  4  5  >

Will Smith Can't Save Hancock
AVERAGE RATING
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Will Smith Can't Save Hancock
By Jeffrey Huston
Crosswalk.com Contributing Writer

Berg goes into stylistic overdrive to try to distract us from how lame this whole development and conclusion is.  But when the character whose secret is in danger of being exposed acts in a way that telegraphs to the world that very secret, well, it just doesn’t make any sense.  Unless, of course, the logic is to throw in some spiffy action sequences. 

But even prior to all of that, Berg’s signature hand-held style (seen in Friday Night Lights and The Kingdom) is really out of place in this summer tent pole wannabe that, given its heightened reality, requires something more polished and less visually confusing.  You’re there to laugh and have a good time, not be distracted by constant headache-inducing camera jerks.  Then, too, are utterly stupid moments (played with dramatic tension) of criminals ominously confronting Hancock or seeking revenge against him knowing full well who he is and what he can do to them.  I mean, seriously?!

Advertisement

The full name of Will Smith’s character, incidentally, is John Hancock—directly inspired by the prominent signature on our Declaration of Independence.  So given that this debacle is released on the weekend we celebrate that signing, it’s a sad irony indeed.  Granted, this scathing review and countless others won’t keep Hancock from opening huge over the Fourth of July weekend, but count me surprised if this movie lives on once its true identity is finally exposed.

CAUTIONS:

  • Drugs/Alcohol:  Drinking, mostly by the troubled hero Hancock.
  • Language/Profanity:  PG-13 levels of profanity throughout (twice by children), much of it delivered cavalierly by Hancock, including one “F” word (which is becoming common in PG-13 fare).  Some dialogue is sexually coarse.
  • Sex/Nudity:  Very little.  At one point, Hancock’s pants are burned and tattered and part of his bottom can be seen.
  • Violence/Other:  A lot of action-violence and destruction (shootings, car wrecks, buildings damaged, etc.).  A hand is severed off and carried around.  A scene of multiple point-blank range shootings.  Hancock literally shoves one prisoner’s head up another’s rear end.

Jeffrey Huston is a film director, writer and producer at Steelehouse Productions in Tulsa, Okla.  He is also cohost of the "Steelehouse Podcast,” along with Steelehouse Executive Creative Mark Steele, where each week they discuss God in pop culture. 

To listen to the weekly podcast, please visit www.steelehouse.com or click here.  You can also subscribe to the "Steelehouse Podcast” through iTunes.
 

Content Provided by: http://www.crosswalk.com

Page   1  2

WHAT DO YOU THINK?
  • jdl82 7/16/2008 3:40 AM
    I went to go see Hancock Monday night. My mother, who had seen it earlier, had strongly suggested that I do.
    Upon entering the theatre, my only knowledge of the film was from one or two of the commercials I happened to have seen, which was this: Will Smith stars as a mean, super-powered, homeless drunk who performs carelessly destructive feats of heroism. Also, one single phrase that I had heard one character say in the commercial also led me to suspect that at some point Will Smith’s character begins to become mortal.
    Jeffrey Huston, the author of the movie’s review at Crosswalk.com, seems to have watched it with a wealth of presumptions fed by a superfluous knowledge of its production history. He was so keen to which parts of the dialogue had been written by which people...

    For the rest of my review, go here: http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=188693716&blogID=415274644
  • Sarizona7 7/7/2008 4:39 PM
    Sorry, Zippy, but I believe the reason some discerning Christians view these movies is so other Christians may follow the instructions in the Scripture you posted. I think many Christian families are most grateful for reviews that enable them to choose wholesome movies for their families.
  • rgod 7/6/2008 1:30 AM
    I just saw Hancock and while I do agree that there were many places where the language was unacceptable (particularly the cursing by the kids), I understood the purpose of the main character using some profanity - particuarly because of how he saw himself. I think that there were some pieces of this film that were quite good actually. There were some themes about the vulnerability that is part of love (I'm not sure though if I agree with the message sent concerning this), a very good message about who is different types of heros - whether they have supernatural strength or a super-human faith in another person's goodness. There was also a good message about how we see ourselves and the erroneous ways in which we might view past events in our lives - and the impact that has on our current living situation. The theme of responsibility is also present as well. For me, the fact this this movie addressed these themes was admirable.

Page   1  2  

  • YouthWorker.com (Salem All-Pass) registration.
    Salem Forums Users: You do not need to register for a new account; your forums account is part of the "Salem All-Pass."
    Registration is Easy and it's FREE!
    Required fields marked with *
    *Username:
    *Password:
    *Confirm Password:
    *E-mail Address:
    FREE NEWSLETTERS

    Terms of Use / Privacy Policy
Subscribe Today
YOUTHWORKER.COM NEWSYOUTHWORKER.COM NEWS
NUTHIN' BUT NETNOTHIN' BUT NET
SEARCH THE BIBLESEARCH THE BIBLE
Salem Publishing