Quantcast
Iron Man Robert Downey Jr. Gwyneth Paltrow Terrence Howard Marvel Comics superhero
The Magazine for Youth Ministry
You Are Here
  HOME  REVIEWS  MOVIES
CHRISTIAN MOVIE REVIEWS SEARCH
X
 CHRISTIAN MOVIE REVIEWS ARCHIVE

Page   1  2  3  4  5  >

Page   1  2  3  4  5  >

Better Luck Next Time for “Iron Man”
AVERAGE RATING
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Better Luck Next Time for “Iron Man”
By Christian Hamaker
Crosswalk.com Contributing Writer

Stark secretly develops the Iron Man suit after being captured by Middle Eastern fighters who demand he build them a bomb. With the help of a fellow prisoner (Shaun Toub)—who’s promptly dispatched and forgotten about as soon as he’s served his purpose in the tale—Stark dons a crude prototype of the Iron Man suit, guns down the bad guys and uses the jet propulsion to fly away.


Having seen the destructive power of his weapons, Stark vows to change the mission of his company. He perfects the technology behind Iron Man, makes a sleeker suit, and plots a return to the Middle East to ensure that his weaponry will no longer be used by the warlords who imprisoned him.


A romantic subplot in which Stark develops serious feelings for his assistant, Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow), sparks to life, but the other supporting work is sub-par. Bridges’ glowering can’t make Stane a very interesting villain. Terrence Howard, as Stark’s trusted friend in the Pentagon, is wasted, and the dignified Shaun Toub, who makes the early portion of Iron Man more interesting than it would have been otherwise, disappears from the film much too early.


Scenes of Stark perfecting his new technology are punctuated with humorous experiments gone awry, but the buildup to the unveiling of the streamlined Iron Man drags out. The second half of the film has Iron Man righting various wrongs, playing cat-and-mouse games with jet fighters, and taking on an imposing competitor. But Downey’s acting during that portion of the film consists of little more than reaction shots from inside his metal suit, while the supporting cast does little more than react to the special-effects-driven battle royal that concludes the film.


A few lines of dialogue hint at more provocative themes for a potential sequel. What do we do when we discover our purpose in life, and how public should we be about that purpose? Stark, a reformed playboy, tells Pepper, “I shouldn’t be alive—unless it was for a reason. I finally know what I have to do.” The film’s ending declaration leaves us wanting another chapter in the Iron Man saga, despite the drawbacks associated with this first attempt.

Questions? Comments? Contact the writer at crosswalkchristian@earthlink.net.

CAUTIONS:

  • Language/Profanity:  Lord’s name taken in vain; foul language.
  • Drugs/Alcohol:  Frequent alcohol consumption early in the film; reference to Stark being drunk during a conference.
  • Sex/Nudity:  Stark is said to have slept with all 12 Maxim cover girls during a year; he flirts with women while gambling and beds a reporter; the woman wakes up the next day, covered by a sheet; a joke about a “lovely lady” who was actually a man.
  • Gambling:  Stark gambles heavily.
  • Violence:  Gunfire; bombs; a car bomb; blood soaks through a bulletproof vest and onto a shirt; victims of gunfire and car bombing are shown; a man performs surgery on himself; a prisoner is tortured and threatened with being burned; experiments gone awry end with Stark thrown against a wall and otherwise abused; a man is threatened in front of his children; a device renders people motionless for 15 minutes.


Content Provided by: http://www.crosswalk.com

Page   1  2

WHAT DO YOU THINK?
  • kingtoruk 5/4/2008 9:36 AM
    Director Favreau finds in Downey an actor capable of conveying the complexities of an alcoholic whose womanizing and abuse of wealth ultimately takes a rear seat to an awakened sense of personal responsibility. The plot plunges him into a hell he's taken part in perpetuating, and a near death experience that leaves him with a sense of purpose that puts his talents to righteous use and overrides his previous hedonistic proclivities.
    Whereas the depiction of Stark's shameless character flaws are neccisarily exhibited and to the point in presentation, they illustrate his character development, and are niether glorified, nor gratuitously exaggerated. That his Iron Man persona ultimately comes across stiff and remorseless owes more to Iron Man's comic-book origins, the function of the character's intentional anonymity when in the armor, and it's physical contribution to Stark's affectation of inhuman mannerisms to dishearten his enemies. It's the way the character was written.
  • goslight 5/3/2008 7:48 PM
    Once again Hollywood is preaching to a captive audience.
    The world has only an appetite for the things that it is consumed in violence, lust, sexual depravity, bloodshed,
    broken relationships and unfaithfulness. Well did Jesus say
    "as it was inthe days of Lot."
    I am 64 and when I was a boy we could only view the Marvel Comic masters in comic book style - there was no TV. My father forbad the introduction of these books into our household knowing full well the influence they would have on young minds. Hollywood is the world's "sewer pit" of violence and
    blasphemy, hpwever, be npt dismayed God will judge.
  • YouthWorker.com (Salem All-Pass) registration.
    Salem Forums Users: You do not need to register for a new account; your forums account is part of the "Salem All-Pass."
    Registration is Easy and it's FREE!
    Required fields marked with *
    *Username:
    *Password:
    *Confirm Password:
    *E-mail Address:
    FREE NEWSLETTERS

    Terms of Use / Privacy Policy
Subscribe Today
YOUTHWORKER.COM NEWSYOUTHWORKER.COM NEWS
NUTHIN' BUT NETNOTHIN' BUT NET
SEARCH THE BIBLESEARCH THE BIBLE
SURVEYYOUTH MINISTRY SURVEY

Are your kids smoking pot?