Quantcast
The Magazine for Youth Ministry
You Are Here
  HOME  REVIEWS  MOVIES
MOVIE REVIEWS SEARCH
X
 MOVIE REVIEWS ARCHIVE

Page   1  2  3  4  5  >

Page   1  2  3  4  5  >

No Cinematic Treasure Found in Fool's Gold
AVERAGE RATING
RATE THIS ARTICLE
No Cinematic Treasure Found in Fool's Gold
By Christa Banister
Crosswalk.com Contributing Writer

DVD Release Date:  June 17, 2008

Theatrical Release Date:  February 8, 2008

Rating:  PG-13 (for action violence, some sexual material, nudity, language)

Genre:  Comedy

Run Time:  113 min.

Director:  Andy Tennant

Actors:  Matthew McConaughey, Kate Hudson, Donald Sutherland, Alexis Dziena, Kevin Hart

It’s been said that “lightning never strikes twice in the same place,” and the adage definitely applies to Matthew McConaughey and Kate Hudson in Fool’s Gold.

Advertisement

While the actors’ easy chemistry and comedic charms made a rather formulaic premise surprisingly entertaining in 2003’s How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days, any hope of striking rom-com gold twice was quickly washed away by a hokey script and hardly a laugh in the Fool's Gold’s nearly two-hour running time.

Incidentally, for anyone who’s wondered if Hudson and McConaughey are indeed this decade’s Meg Ryan and Tom Hanks as many movie mags have recently suggested, well forget it. Although the easy-on-the-eyes pair gives it their best effort, they just don’t look like they’re having that much fun here.

Perhaps that’s because the treasure-solving initiative they’re supposed to be all excited about really isn’t that interesting. Sure, there may be diamonds, rubies and emeralds “the size of your fist” at large, but the history behind the treasure is told to such detailed (and boring) effect, that it’s hard to believe these sun-kissed creatures ever cared in the first place.

So in the absence of a well-crafted (or at least semi-entertaining) story, the filmmakers attempt to trick the audience by putting a whole lot of bronzed skin on parade. And while it’s clear that Hudson and McConaughey especially have done their due diligence at the gym, that’s hardly enough to even consider Fool’s Gold a guilty pleasure.

Unlike, say, National Treasure where the history lesson is light and breezy, McConaughey’s Ben “Finn” Finnegan and his now- ex-wife Tess (Hudson) are obsessed with some booty that’s far more obscure—the legendary Queen’s Dowry, a ship full of Spanish treasure that supposedly sunk in the Caribbean in the early 1700s.

Since the treasure’s apparently worth a rather large fortune, although how much is never really clarified, Finn just can’t forget about it. And when Finn’s repeated failed attempts to capture it put him in hot water with a rapper named Bigg Bunny (Kevin Hart), Finn hopes that trying to find the dowry one more time will not only help him pay off his debts, but will repair his crumbled marriage to the woman he still loves.

Content Provided by: http://www.crosswalk.com

Page   1  2

WHAT DO YOU THINK?
  • rnjonker 6/23/2008 1:30 PM
    Keeping it short and to the point. What God or "god" do you serve. To use the phrase "Oh my god.." can be any god but "Jesus" is the son of the living God and is God. In this movie His name is used explicitely and invain. Do the math. Do not compromise.

    Very offensive
  • tmbrown 6/18/2008 4:55 PM
    I agree with the last person that commented. This is a christian website. Their sole purpose in reviewing movies is so that we can be aware of content in a movie before we actually see it. As an adult, you have the right to determine for yourself if the questionable content they list is enough to stop you from seeing a movie or not. Before I started reading christian movie reviews, it was really difficult to find good movies. You never knew if a movie had really offensive elements that they had kept hidden in the movie trailer. As far as the reviewer not thinking this movie was funny, is a matter of opinion. But you get that from any movie reviewer. You either find a reviewer you usually agree with or if it's something you want to see, you see it and judge for yourself. It is uncalled for to berate the movie critics on this site for doing nothing more than providing a much needed service. If you don't like their reviews-don't read them.
  • j.is.blessed 6/17/2008 11:49 PM
    Please correct me if I am wrong, but this is a Christian website. The critics are writing their reviews based on bibical principle. Some of the things mentioned, such as brief nudity, language and so on are caution for us. God clearly speaks about these things in the bible. It is true that what you may watch is not condeming for you, but for someone else it may be, this is why they write their reviews. I know I feel more condemed about sexual content in a movie. If you don't like what the critic has to say, then don't come to this site. The critic has a duty to show us what is not bibically correct about a movie. To those that come here looking for a review only to shoot down the critic, maybe you should go to Yahoo movies and read their reviews. I personally and glad to hear what they think of the movie. Remember, you are coming to a Christian website, not a secular one. Please, be respectful.

Page   1  2  

  • YouthWorker.com (Salem All-Pass) registration.
    Salem Forums Users: You do not need to register for a new account; your forums account is part of the "Salem All-Pass."
    Registration is Easy and it's FREE!
    Required fields marked with *
    *Username:
    *Password:
    *Confirm Password:
    *E-mail Address:
    FREE NEWSLETTERS

    Terms of Use / Privacy Policy
Subscribe Today
YOUTHWORKER.COM NEWSYOUTHWORKER.COM NEWS
NUTHIN' BUT NETNOTHIN' BUT NET
SEARCH THE BIBLESEARCH THE BIBLE
Salem Publishing